USGS home page

Virginia Online Bibliography

Publications Retrieval for chesapeake


  1. Bell, C.F., Belval, D.L., Campbell, J.P., 1996, Trends in nutrients and suspended solids at the Fall Line of five tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay, July 1988 through June 1995: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4191, 37 p.
  2. Belval, D.L., Campbell, J.P., Phillips, S.W., and Bell, C.F., 1995, Water-quality characteristics of five tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay at the Fall Line, Virginia, July 1988 through June 1993: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4258, 71 p.
  3. Belval, D.L., and Campbell, J.P., 1996, Water-quality data and estimated loads of selected constituents in five tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay at the Fall Line, Virginia, July 1993 through June 1995: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-220, 79 p.
  4. Belval, D.L, and Sprague, L.A., 1999, Monitoring nutrients in the major rivers draining to Chesapeake Bay: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4238, 8 p.
  5. Belval, D.L., and Zynjuk, L.D., 1994, Comparison of nutrient loadings among major tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland and Virginia [abs.]: 1994 Chesapeake Research Conference, June 1­3, 1994, Norfolk Waterside Marriott Hotel, Va.
  6. Church, T.M., Scudlark, J.R., Conko, K.M., Bricker, O.P., and Rice, K.C., 1998, Transmission of atmospherically deposited trace elements through an undeveloped, forested Maryland watershed: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Division, CBWP-MANTA-AD-98-2, 87 p.
  7. Emry, S., McFarland, E.R., and Powars, D., 2002, Societal implications of an impact crater - Chesapeake Bay impact structure, Virginia [abs.]: American Geophysical Union, 2002 Spring Meeting Program, Washington, D.C., May 2002, Abstract No. T21A-01.
  8. Focazio, M.J., Plummer, L.N., Bohlke J.K., Busenberg, E., Bachman, L.J., and Powars, D.S., 1998, Preliminary estimates of residence times and apparent ages of ground water in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and water-quality data from a survey of springs: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4225, 75 p.
  9. Gohn, G.S., Bruce, T.S., Catchings, R.D., Emry, S.R., Johnson, G.H., Levine, J.S., McFarland, E.R., Poag, C.W., and Powars, D.S., 2001, Integrated geologic, hydrologic, and geophysical investigations of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, Virginia, USA: A multi-agency program [abs.]: 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 12-16, 2001, Houston, Texas, Abstract no. 1901.
  10. Hamilton, P.A., and Laczniak, R.J., 1986, Application of a ground-water flow model to assess regional effects of ground-water withdrawals on Chesapeake Bay: Third Annual Regional Ground-Water Conference, National Water Well Association, Proceedings, 17 p.
  11. Hancock, T.C., Denver, J.M., Riedel, G.F., Miller, C.V., 2001, Reconnaissance for Arsenic in a Poultry Dominated Chesapeake Bay Watershed -- Examination of Source, Transport, and Fate, [abs.], US EPA Workshop Managing Arsenic Risks to the Environment: Characterization of Waste, Chemistry, and Treatment and Disposal, May 1-3, 2001, Denver, Colorado.
  12. Hancock, T.C., Miller, C.V., Denver, J.M., Riedel, G.F., 2000,Fate and Transport of Arsenical Feed Amendments in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds, [abs.], Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21st Annual Meeting, November 12-16, 2000, Nashville, Tenn.
  13. Harlow, G.E., Jr., Augenstein, T.W., Samsel, T.B., III, and Wilson, W.D., 1996, Geographic information system data base for the Elizabeth River watershed, Virginia [abs.], in Chesapeake Bay Symposium, Richmond, Va.: Virginia Journal of Science 46 (4), p. 264.
  14. Hirsch, R.M., Moyer, D.L., and Archfield, S.A., 2010, Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS), With an Application to Chesapeake Bay River Inputs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 46(5):857-880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00482.x
  15. Hong, B., Shen, J., Rice, K.C., and Bennett, M.R., 2010, Modeling study of salinity change under different sea-level rise scenarios in the Chesapeake Bay: Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2010, May 10-12, Annapolis, MD
  16. Horton, J.W., Jr., Powars, D.S., and Gohn, G.S., eds. 2005, Studies of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure-- The USGS-NASA Langley corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and related coreholes and geophysical surveys U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1688 - chapters A-K, serarately paginated.[453 p., 2 oversize figures].
  17. Jastram, J.D., Moyer, D.L., and Hyer, K.E., 2009, A comparison of turbidity-based and streamflow-based estimates of suspended-sediment concentrations in three Chesapeake Bay tributaries: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5165, 37 p.
  18. Langland, M.J., 2007, Streamflow, nutrient and sediment concentrations and loads, and water-quality change is selected nontidal basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 1985-2006: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report OF 2007-1372.
  19. Langland, M.J., Blomquist, J.D., Sprague, L.A., and Edwards, R.E., 2000, Trends and status of flow, nutrients, and sediments for selected nontidal sites in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 1985-98: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-451, 46 p.
  20. Langland, M.J., Raffensperger, J.P., Moyer, D.L., Landwehr, J.M., and Schwarz, G.E., 2006, Changes in Streamflow and Water Quality in Selected Nontidal Basins in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, 1985-2004: U.S.Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5178, 75 p., plus appendices(on CD).
  21. Langland, M.J., Raffensperger, J.P., and Moyer, D.L., 2004, Changes in Streamflow and Water Quality in Selected Nontidal Sites in the Chesapeake Bay Basin, 1985-2003: U.S.Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5259, 50 p.
  22. Lindsey, B.D., Phillips, S.W., Donnelly, C.A., Speiran, G.K., Plummer, L.N., Bohlke, J.K., Focazio, M.J., Burton, W.C., and Busenberg, Eurybiades, 2003, Residence times and nitrate transport in ground water discharging to streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4035, 201 p.
  23. Martucci, S.K., Krstolic, J.L., Raffensperger, J.P., and Hopkins, K.J., 2005, Development of Land Segmentation, Stream-Reach Network, and Watersheds in Support of Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) Modeling, Chesapeake Bay Watershed, and Adjacent Parts of Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5073, 24 p.
  24. McFarland, E.R., 2002, Hydrochemical evidence for the origin of elevated ground-water salinity in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure [abs.], Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, October 2002, Abstract No. 204-9.
  25. McFarland, E.R., 2002, Water-supply constraints in the Virginia Coastal Plain resulting from elevated ground-water salinity in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure [abs.], Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, October 2002, Abstract No. 100-6.
  26. McFarland, E.R., and Bruce, S., 2002, Distribution, origin, and relations to flow of salty ground water along the western margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure in eastern Virginia [abs.]: American Geophysical Union, 2002 Spring Meeting Program, Washington, D.C., May 2002, Abstract No. T21A-08.
  27. McFarland, E.R., and Bruce, T.S., 2004, Distribution, origin, and resource-management implications of ground-water salinity along the western margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, in ICDP-USGS Workshop on Deep Drilling in the Central Crater of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure, Virginia, USA: Proceedings Volume: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1016, p. 34-35.
  28. McFarland, E.R., and Bruce, T.S., in press, Distribution origin, and resource-management implications of ground-water salinkity along the western margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure in eastern Virginia, chap. K of Horton, J.W., Jr., Powars, D.S., and Gohn, G.S., eds., Studies of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure-- The USGS-NASA Langely corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and related coreholes and geophysical surveys: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1688.
  29. McFarland, E.R., and Pope, J.P., 2004, Spatial analysis of the hydrogeologic framework of the Virginia Coastal Plain, in ICDP-USGS Workshop on Deep Drilling in the Central Crater of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure, Virginia, USA: Proceedings Volume: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1016, p. 35-36.
  30. Moyer, D.L., and Bennett, M.R., 2007, Development of relations of stream stage to channel geometry and discharge for stream segments simulated with Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF), Chesapeake Bay Watershed and adjacent parts of Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5135, 83 p.
  31. Powars, D.P., Johnson, G.H., Bruce, T.S., and Edwards, L.E., 2001, The relation between the Chesapeake Bay impact structure and the structure and stratigraphy of Cenozoic deposits in eastern Virginia [abs.], to be presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Geological Society of America Southeastern Section, April 5-6, 2001.
  32. Powars, D.S., 2000, The effects of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater on the geologic framework and the correlation of hydrogeologic units of southeastern Virginia, south of the James River: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1622, 53 p., 1 pl.
  33. Powars, D.S., Gohn, G.S., Catchings, R.D., McFarland, E.R., Bruce, T.S., Johnson, G.H., Izett, G.A., Emry, S.A., and Edwards, L.E., 2001, Deep corehole and seismic reflection data provide insights into crater-filling processes and the hydrogeology of the outer margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, eastern Virginia Coastal Plain, USA [abs.]: 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 12-16, 2001, Houston, Texas, Abstract no. 2183.
  34. Powars, D.S., Johnson , G.H., Edwards, L.E., Horton, J.W., Jr., Gohn, G.S., Catchings, R.D., McFarland, E.R., Izett, G.A., Bruce, T.S., Levine, J.S., and Pierce, H.A., 2002, An expanded Chesapeake Bay impact structure, eastern Virginia: New corehole and geophysical data [abs.]: 33rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, League City, Texas, March 2002, Abstract No. 1034.
  35. Powars, D.S., Quick, J.E., Bruce, T.S., Catchings, R.D., Emry, S.R., Gohn, G.S., Izett, G.A., Johnson, G.H., Levine, J.S., McFarland, E.R., and Poag, C.W., 2001, Structure and composition of the southwestern margin of the buried Chesapeake Bay impact structure, in Morgan, M.L., and Warme, J.E., Bolide impacts on wet targets [abs.]: Geological Society of America Field Forum, Nevada and Utah, April 2001, not paginated.
  36. Powars, D.S., and Bruce, T. S., 1999, The effects of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater on the geological framework and correlation of hydrogeologic units of the lower York-James Peninsula, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1612, 82 p., 9 pl.
  37. Powars, David S., Quick, James E., Bruce, T. Scott, Catchings, Rufus D., Emry, Scott R., Gohn, Gregory S., Izett, G.A., Johnson, Gerald H., Levine, Joel S., McFarland, E. Randolph, and Poag, C. Wylie, 2001, Structure and composition of the southwestern margin of the buried Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure [abs.], to be presented at the GSA Field Forum in Nevada and Utah on bolide impacts on wet targets, April 22-28, 2001.
  38. Rice, K.C., 2009, Forecasting effects of climate and land-use changes in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: USGS Chesapeake Bay Science Workshop, Oct. 27-28, 2009, NCTC, Shepherdstown, WV
  39. Rice, K.C., Bennett, M.R., and Shen, J., 2011, Simulated changes in salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from projected sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1191, 31 p. ONLINE ONLY.
  40. Rice, K.C., Shen, J., Hong, B., 2010, Simulated changes in salinity in the York and James River estuaries, Southeastern Virginia, USA,from projected sea-level rise in the Chesapeake Bay: Fall AGU meeting, Dec. 13-17, 2010, San Francisco, CA
  41. Rice, K.C. and Bricker, O.P., 1991, Geology-based method of assessing sensitivity of streams to acidic deposition in Charles and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland: Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Division, Tidewater Administration, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, CBRM-AD-91-15, 15 p. and 2 plates.
  42. Richardson, D.L., and Bell, C.F., 1994, A method for estimating ground-water discharge from the Coastal Plain of Virginia: 1994 Chesapeake Research Conference, June 1­3, 1994, Norfolk Waterside Marriott Hotel, Proceedings.
  43. Sanford, W. E. and Pope, J. P., 2007, A simulation of groundwater discharge and nitrate delivery to Chesapeake Bay from the lowermost Delmarva Peninsula, USA., in Sanford, W., Langevin, C., Polemio, M., and Povinec. P., eds., 2007, A new focus on groundwater-seawater interactions: IAHS Publication 312, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, p. 326-333.
  44. Sanford, W.E. and Pope, J.P., 2011, Use of Regional Groundwater Models to Estimate Potential Submarine Groundwater Discharge along the Chesapeake Bay [abs.]: National Ground Water Association, 2011 Ground Water Summit and 2011 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, May 1-5.
  45. Senus, M.P., Langland, M.J., and Moyer, D.L., 2005, Nutrient and sediment concentrations, loads, and trends for four nontidal tributaries in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 1997-2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5125, 33 p.
  46. Speiran, G.K., 1994, Effects of sediment composition and land cover on nitrate concentrations and ground-water discharge to estuaries on the Eastern Shore, Virginia [abs.]: 1994 Chesapeake Research Conference, June 1­3, 1994, Norfolk Waterside Marriott Hotel, Va.
  47. Speiran, G.K., Hamilton, P.A., and Woodside, M.D., 1998, Natural processes for managing nitrate in ground water discharged to Chesapeake Bay and other surface waters-more than forested buffers: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 178-97.
  48. Sprague, L.A., 2001, Effects of storm-sampling frequency on estimation of water-quality loads and trends in two tributaries to Chesapeake Bay in Virginia U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4136, 38 p. [PDF file-1,065 KB].
  49. Sprague, L.A., and others, 2000, Factors affecting nutrient trends in major rivers of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4218, 98 p.